<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi again.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Is it correctly assumed that a query command is
handled </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>by sending the actual query in a drawinfo to the
text screen,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>and then just the prompt and query type in the
query command?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If that really is so (it sure seems like it in the
Protocol draft) I sure</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>wonder why. Why not send the the query text in the
query packet?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This way the client can display a nice dialogue
instead of just</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>outputting some text in the window and expect an
answer.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>By doing it this way the risk is high that the user
dont notice</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>the query and just wonders whats up when nothing
happens.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>A dialogue that pops up would be much nicer in my
opinion, but</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>that would require that the actual query is in the
query packet and </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>not already written to the output
area.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Comments?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> // Isak
Styf</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>