Hey everyone, I'm upgrading to a slightly more powerful server for our school's Web server, and I'm trying to decide if I should run Debian's "stable" or venture out and run "unstable." Normally I think this would be a relative no-brainer, but since I'm developing with Zope, and Zope development moves pretty fast these days, I'm finding that I need some stuff in "unstable" that's not found in "stable." For example, I really need to run the latest PostgreSQL. I know that I can selectively upgrade packages, but in the interest of keeping this as painless as possible, I'm thinking that it might be easier to be "unstable" in this case. This server isn't really running very many services: ssh, apache, zope, postfix, proftpd, and Mailman are about it. No DNS, NFS, etc. Just C/C++ devel packages and Python really. What do you think? -Tim -- Tim Wilson | Visit Sibley online: | Check out: Henry Sibley HS | http://www.isd197.k12.mn.us/ | http://www.zope.org/ W. St. Paul, MN | | http://slashdot.org/ wilson at visi.com | <dtml-var pithy_quote> | http://linux.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe at mn-linux.org For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help at mn-linux.org