On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:45:48PM -0600, Ben Lutgens wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:24:24PM -0600, Jim Crumley wrote: > > > >Yeah, and mutt has no problem with either of them <ducks>. > > > I use mutt and have no problems with gpg keys, sigs or the like. I can send > you my procmail and muttrc excerpts if you like. Me and the fellas from work > put alot of work into them. I am looking into trying to make a procmail rule > to rewrite the mails that those damnable windows MUAs generate. Oops, I should have looked more closely at your header. I don't understand why those messages give you problems. It looks like we both use the same version of mutt - 1.2.5i. My muttrc is fairly vanilla - just a slightly hacked up version of a sample from mutt.org. -- Jim Crumley | crumley at fields.space.umn.edu | Work: 612 624-6804 or -0378 |