HELP -- REMOVE MY EMAIL ADDRESS FROM YOU SYSTEM, THANK-YOU. ----- Original Message ----- From: <tclug-list-request at lists.real-time.com> To: <tclug-list at lists.real-time.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:21 AM Subject: tclug-list digest, Vol 1 #492 - 16 msgs > Send tclug-list mailing list submissions to > tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > tclug-list-request at lists.real-time.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > tclug-list-admin at lists.real-time.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tclug-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. RE: Do I need my 675? (Austad, Jay) > 2. Re: Do I need my 675? (Bill Layer) > 3. RE: Do I need my 675? (Austad, Jay) > 4. Re: [OT] My OmniKey died!!!!!!!!!! (Nate Carlson) > 5. Re: Squid log analysis (Nate Carlson) > 6. Re: Do I need my 675? (Bill Layer) > 7. Re: [OT] My OmniKey died!!!!!!!!!! (Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom) > 8. apache (Brett Astleford) > 9. Re: [OT] My OmniKey died!!!!!!!!!! (Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom) > 10. Re: Do I need my 675? (Ben Lutgens) > 11. Re: [OT] My OmniKey died!!!!!!!!!! (Nate Carlson) > 12. Re: apache (Ben Lutgens) > 13. Re: apache (Cook, Justin S.) > 14. To ORBS or not to ORBS that is the question (Bob Tanner) > 15. RE: Do I need my 675? (Austad, Jay) > 16. A little clarification... (mjn) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "Austad, Jay" <austad at marketwatch.com> > To: "'tclug-list at lists.real-time.com'" <tclug-list at lists.real-time.com> > Subject: RE: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:37:27 -0600 > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > The only way to dump the cisco 675 would be if someone made a kernel module > for the Intel 2100 interal aDSL/ATM card. Then you'd have to figure out a > way to fit it on the coyote disk, which wouldn't be hard if you didn't need > pppd on it (pppd weighs in at 147k). From what it looks like, this will > never happen. > > Jay > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ben Lutgens [mailto:blutgens at sistina.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 8:43 AM > > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:54:53AM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote: > > >Quoting Timothy Wilson (wilson at visi.com): > > > > > >What decodes the DSL signaling? Is there some sort of DSL card in it? > > > > > Yeah, that's the problem. I did see a PCI CSU/DSU card for > > sale once (At LWE I > > think) Seems to me it ran linux on chip. Might as well stay > > with the cisco > > FWIW. > > -- > > Ben Lutgens cell: 612.670.4789 http://www.sistina.com/ > > Sistina Software Inc. work: 612.379.3951 > > Code Monkey Support (A.K.A. System Administrator) > > Key fingerprint = A69A 118D 710B 8EB0 DC3B D912 2F19 311A 02DD 1908 > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > From: "Bill Layer" <b.layer at vikingelectronics.com> > Organization: Viking Electronics, Inc. > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:48:36 -0600 > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > On Tuesday 05 December 2000 09:37, you wrote: > > The only way to dump the cisco 675 would be if someone made a kernel module > > for the Intel 2100 interal aDSL/ATM card. > > I was given the impression that the Intel 2100 aDSL modem is an HSP design > aka Win Modem. Can anyone confirm or deny? > > If this is true, can anyone accurately ascertain how much that sucks? ;) > > > -- > Bill Layer > > <b.layer at vikingelectronics.com> > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > From: "Austad, Jay" <austad at marketwatch.com> > To: "'tclug-list at lists.real-time.com'" <tclug-list at lists.real-time.com> > Subject: RE: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:02:45 -0600 > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > > I was given the impression that the Intel 2100 aDSL modem is > > an HSP design > > aka Win Modem. Can anyone confirm or deny? > > I seem to remember reading the same thing somewhere. I know Cisco makes one > of these PCI cards though also. I wonder if Cisco's is built the same. I > know USWorst switched to Intel from the Cisco card, I assume to cut costs. > If the Cisco card was alot more expensive, there may be a good chance that > it's not HSP. Of course, it's Cisco and subject to price inflation because > of the name. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bill Layer [mailto:b.layer at vikingelectronics.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 9:49 AM > > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > > > > > > On Tuesday 05 December 2000 09:37, you wrote: > > > The only way to dump the cisco 675 would be if someone made > > a kernel module > > > for the Intel 2100 interal aDSL/ATM card. > > > > I was given the impression that the Intel 2100 aDSL modem is > > an HSP design > > aka Win Modem. Can anyone confirm or deny? > > > > If this is true, can anyone accurately ascertain how much > > that sucks? ;) > > > > > > -- > > Bill Layer > > > > <b.layer at vikingelectronics.com> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tclug-list mailing list > > tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:13:02 -0600 (CST) > From: Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> > To: <tclug-list at lists.real-time.com> > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] [OT] My OmniKey died!!!!!!!!!! > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote: > > 4-speaker flat-panel array with subwoofer. he wins stereo wars. :) > > now if only he'd get some new music... ;> > > eh, you just can't take classics, my good man. > > -- > Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 > http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (952)943-8500 > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:14:17 -0600 (CST) > From: Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> > To: TCLUG List <tclug-list at lists.real-time.com> > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Squid log analysis > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Andy Zbikowski wrote: > > I just finished setting up webalizer to analize squid's logfiles. To get it > > working I grabbed > > squid2common.pl ( http://www.unimelb.edu.au/pwebstats/squid2common.pl ) and > > set it up in cron to run before webalizer. I thought webalizer supported > > squids logfiles without extra help but couldn't find anything in the > > documentation. > > > > For now, this should ge me the information I want. I figured I'd give > > webalizer a try since I was allrady somewhat familiar with it and it is a > > package in Debian. But if anyone has any success/horror stories about other > > packages ( http://www.squid-cache.org/Scripts/ ) I'd love to hear them > > (along with any recomendations) > > > > Since we are using Squid to sorta filter internet sites it would be nice to > > get a more indepth analysis of sites visited, but for now, webalizer fits > > the bill. > > sqmgrlog is pretty cool. i haven't gotten it working quite right yet, but > it's nice.. > > -- > Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 > http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (952)943-8500 > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > From: "Bill Layer" <b.layer at vikingelectronics.com> > Organization: Viking Electronics, Inc. > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:14:19 -0600 > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > BTW, > > > I know USWorst switched to Intel from the Cisco card, > > I have a spare, new in the box Intel 2100 aDSL modem. Includes the line > filters, etc. Anyone wants it, make an offer. > > -- > Bill Layer > Sales Technician > <b.layer at vikingelectronics.com> > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:19:16 -0600 > From: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chrome at real-time.com> > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] [OT] My OmniKey died!!!!!!!!!! > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > > > now if only he'd get some new music... ;> > > > > eh, you just can't take classics, my good man. > > I don't think the Bloodhound Gang constitutes 'classics'. > ...well, maybe to a young'un like youself... > > ;> > > Carl Soderstrom > -- > Network Engineer > Real-Time Enterprises > (952) 943-8700 > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > From: "Brett Astleford" <bastleford at platinumdg.com> > To: <tclug-list at mn-linux.org> > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:22:39 -0600 > Subject: [TCLUG] apache > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_007F_01C05EA5.4B730DA0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi, > My apache sever will not let me post information. I get the 405 = > error(see below). Is this a httpd.conf problem or permissions problem? = > Help would be greatly appreciated. > > thanks, > > error# 405 method not allowed(post method) > ver: Apache/1.3.14 > > Brett Astleford=20 > Platinum Design Group=20 > bastleford at platinumdg.com > > ------=_NextPart_000_007F_01C05EA5.4B730DA0 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> > <HTML><HEAD> > <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = > http-equiv=3DContent-Type> > <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2920.0" name=3DGENERATOR> > <STYLE></STYLE> > </HEAD> > <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> > <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>My apache sever will not let me post=20 > information. I get the 405 error(see below). Is this=20 > a httpd.conf problem or permissions problem? Help would = > be=20 > greatly appreciated.</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>thanks,</FONT></DIV> > <DIV> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>error# 405 method not allowed(post=20 > method)</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>ver: Apache/1.3.14</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><BR>Brett Astleford <BR>Platinum = > Design Group=20 > <BR><A=20 > href=3D"mailto:bastleford at platinumdg.com">bastleford at platinumdg.com</A></= > FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> > > ------=_NextPart_000_007F_01C05EA5.4B730DA0-- > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:30:57 -0600 > From: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chrome at real-time.com> > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] [OT] My OmniKey died!!!!!!!!!! > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > > Actually, a company in Hamil MN (apparently 30 mins from mpls) bought the > > blueprints and makes something called the "Avant > > Stellar" (http://www.cvtinc.com/kybdfeatures.htm), which is > > supposedly the samething, but with Windoze keys. And for $170. For the > > CHEAP ones. > > > > Ok, this keyboard is HEAVY - it's made of steel. It is EXTREMELY > > resilient. The keys CLICK most satisfyingly. > > > > Also, most models are VERY programmable. You can interchange the locations > > of the Ctrl and CAPSlock, among others. Or Dvorak it. The key caps are all > > removable. > > > > Oh, you can get them with the F-Keys on the side, where they belong. > > only problem I see with them, is that they have those oversized <enter> > keys; which are a complete waste of space. at least they don't look like > they cropped the <backspace> key. I've never had trouble hitting the > normal-sized <enter> key; but undersized <backspace> keys drive me nuts. > (when you mistype as often as I do, backspace keys are very important). > > they look interesting, tho. > > Carl. > -- > Network Engineer > Real-Time Enterprises > (952) 943-8700 > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:34:48 -0600 > From: Ben Lutgens <blutgens at sistina.com> > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > > --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 09:48:36AM -0600, Bill Layer wrote: > > > >If this is true, can anyone accurately ascertain how much that sucks? ;) > > > Bill, is this even a question?=20 > --=20 > Ben Lutgens cell: 612.670.4789 http://www.sistina.com/ > Sistina Software Inc. work: 612.379.3951 > Code Monkey Support (A.K.A. System Administrator) > Key fingerprint =3D A69A 118D 710B 8EB0 DC3B D912 2F19 311A 02DD 1908 > > --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > Content-Disposition: inline > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE6LRkoLxkxGgLdGQgRAkF2AJ0UtMrYGQyZtyT0ZYg5d15I4nXpZACgyKk3 > In9BjCBAnuwN3ed3uHj9FZM= > =UEXu > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:37:22 -0600 (CST) > From: Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> > To: <tclug-list at lists.real-time.com> > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] [OT] My OmniKey died!!!!!!!!!! > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote: > > > > now if only he'd get some new music... ;> > > > > > > eh, you just can't take classics, my good man. > > > > I don't think the Bloodhound Gang constitutes 'classics'. > > ...well, maybe to a young'un like youself... > > that's just random crap that made my playlist.. hehe > > -- > Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 > http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (952)943-8500 > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:41:46 -0600 > From: Ben Lutgens <blutgens at sistina.com> > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] apache > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > > --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:22:39AM -0600, Brett Astleford wrote: > <FLAME_BAIT> > Your problems are probably due to the fast that you use Outlook Express as > your mail client. > > Once again we have inconsiderate people posting to the list these multipart > alternative. God is it so hard to understand? > </FLAME_BAIT> > > Now on to your question. First of all you should be aware that this is NOT > enough information for anyone to riddle out your problem. At a minimum you > need to following. > > Distro You're using. > What you try to accomplish (more detail needed) > Exact errors (i.e. log excerpts) > Version of software > > Secondly before you post to a list, please read the mailing list archives > (both for tclug and in this case apache), the documentation that came with > your software and on the website of the software in question. Being an > administrator who babysits a couple webserver I can tell you that I have ne= > ver > had a problem finding info on the apache website. And I guarantee your > question will be answered there. > > It looks like it's definitely an httpd.conf problem. > > --=20 > Ben Lutgens cell: 612.670.4789 http://www.sistina.com/ > Sistina Software Inc. work: 612.379.3951 > Code Monkey Support (A.K.A. System Administrator) > Key fingerprint =3D A69A 118D 710B 8EB0 DC3B D912 2F19 311A 02DD 1908 > > --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > Content-Disposition: inline > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE6LRrKLxkxGgLdGQgRAnKyAJ0bcVcCP01aF7r+rLy6CMx9/5daKQCgjPH+ > enNV8G3s/ztM80pgYBj3Bn8= > =0YHu > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:44:07 -0600 > From: "Cook, Justin S." <jcook at k-lug.com> > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] apache > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > Are you posting to an HTML file? What are you posting to/from? > > Justin Cook > mailto:jcook at k-lug.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Brett Astleford <bastleford at platinumdg.com> > To: <tclug-list at mn-linux.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:22 AM > Subject: [TCLUG] apache > > > Hi, > My apache sever will not let me post information. I get the 405 error(see > below). Is this a httpd.conf problem or permissions problem? Help would be > greatly appreciated. > > thanks, > > error# 405 method not allowed(post method) > ver: Apache/1.3.14 > > Brett Astleford > Platinum Design Group > bastleford at platinumdg.com > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:07:52 -0600 > From: Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > Subject: [TCLUG] To ORBS or not to ORBS that is the question > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > I have got several scathing email about spam mail on the mailing list. > > First, I'd like to say I am an legitimate child, so naming calling of my mother > is not very nice. :-P > > Second, yes, the email can be vulgar. > > Third, yes, we can block more of it. > > On point 3, I am putting it to the list. I can turn ORBS back on, but it seems > to block lots of legitimate email. In fact several people sent email to me > asking why ORBS bounced them. > > So, there it is. To ORBS or not to ORBS. > > Clay/Scott can you do a poll on the web site? > > List is open to discussion... > > -- > Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> | Phone : (612)943-8700 > http://www.mn-linux.org | Fax : (612)943-8500 > Key fingerprint = 6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9 > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 15 > From: "Austad, Jay" <austad at marketwatch.com> > To: "'tclug-list at lists.real-time.com'" <tclug-list at lists.real-time.com> > Subject: RE: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:06:22 -0600 > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > > I have a spare, new in the box Intel 2100 aDSL modem. > > Includes the line > > filters, etc. Anyone wants it, make an offer. > > I have two of em. <slashdot troll>Maybe we could build a beowulf cluster > out of them</slashdot troll> > > :) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bill Layer [mailto:b.layer at vikingelectronics.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:14 AM > > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Do I need my 675? > > > > > > BTW, > > > > > I know USWorst switched to Intel from the Cisco card, > > > > I have a spare, new in the box Intel 2100 aDSL modem. > > Includes the line > > filters, etc. Anyone wants it, make an offer. > > > > -- > > Bill Layer > > Sales Technician > > <b.layer at vikingelectronics.com> > > _______________________________________________ > > tclug-list mailing list > > tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 16 > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:10:28 -0600 (CST) > From: mjn <mjn at umn.edu> > To: Twirling Pickles of Death <tclug-list at lists.real-time.com> > Subject: [TCLUG] A little clarification... > Reply-To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > > I posted something about this yesterday but i think was rather foggy on > details and had words like "novell" and "groupwise" in it so no one paid > attention. I have thought a bit more about it and here is the revised > situation... > > The shop I work in is in the process of retiring some old host names. We > are working towards shutting down an old mercury mail server and we would > like to, along with redirecting any mail coming into that server, notify > all senders that the host name/addres has changed. > > So, basically, we would like to forward all incoming mail to the correct > new address(we have these aliases already), and would also like to > generate an email to send back to the orginator of the message. > > This email, in the best of all worlds, would have some information on the > hostname change and would also look in our aliases and pull out the > correct email address(based on where it was sent to and the alias that > corresponds to it) so that the user can easily update their address book. > > Anyone have ideas? > > I figure we would just tack a pointer to a script onto the alias and have > that script do all the work; that way the mail gets forwarded and another > copy goes to the mail processing script. My only problem is I am unsure > of what scripting language I should use (procmail?) and if reading the > alias file will be possible. Anyone know of a pre-built script which will > do this? > > Thanks... > > ____________________________ > Mike Neuharth > ADCS Technology Specialist > http://www.umn.edu/adcs > > E-Mail : mjn at umn.edu > Page Mail : 6126486512 at page.metrocall.com > http://nifty.dsl.visi.com/ > ____________________________ > > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > End of tclug-list Digest >