> 600mb drive that could be a problem. (*coughbastardcough* ;) Take it
> down to 128mb or something and give us some numbers...

What?  And destroy my manly 512MB ego?  NEVER! 

I'll consider 256MB, but it'll have to be right after a fight where I whoop
some ass, or while drinking shots of everclear to maintain a "virtual 512MB
ego".  :)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Callum Lerwick [mailto:lerwick at tcfreenet.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 12:44 PM
> To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com
> Subject: Re: [TCLUG] REAL Verbatim drive Q (:
> 
> 
> "Austad, Jay" wrote:
> > 
> > > Next time, do your test with 2x or more the amount of ram.
> > 
> > I would have, but I wanted to test the FS's on the MO 
> drive.  I have 512MB
> > of RAM in that box.  I guess I could have cranked the size 
> up as high as
> > possible though.
> 
> You need to test with a file at least twice the size of RAM 
> so that high
> level OS caching doesn't mess with the results. But with 
> 512mb RAM and a
> 600mb drive that could be a problem. (*coughbastardcough* ;) Take it
> down to 128mb or something and give us some numbers...
> _______________________________________________
> tclug-list mailing list
> tclug-list at lists.real-time.com
> https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>