Quoting Adam Maloney (adamm at sihope.com):
> I wouldn't have a problem using the 675 to do the NAT, but I wouldn't use
> it as the firewall just because it's not powerful/configurable enough.  I
> have a routed block so I'm not doing NAT, but none of my customers have
> any problems with it.  Some of them are even doing some pretty complicated
> static NAT entries.

Unless things have changed the 675 does not do NAT, it only does PAT, thus it
forces you to have an intern LAN of 10.0.0.1.
-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com>       | Phone : (612)943-8700
http://www.mn-linux.org                 | Fax   : (612)943-8500
Key fingerprint =  6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9