Have you tried using the Mozilla IMAP client yet?  I have no idea if it would 
be fast enough for you, but it is worth a try.

Bret.




On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:16 am, you wrote:
> > I don't know if this helps or not, but I just read that IBM
> > is producing a Domino server that is supposed to "play well
> > with Outlook".  I think if I remember correctly it's based on Linux.
>
> Have you used Domino though?  I have, it sucks bigtime.
>
> Anyway, I just need something to run under linux that will play well with
> exchange and use all of the scheduling features, and handle my enormous
> mailbox.  Every single IMAP client I try either seg faults halfway through
> grabbing my message headers, is abysmally slow, or doesn't find all of my
> folders.
>
> Jay
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Austad, Jay [mailto:austad at marketwatch.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:54 PM
> > To: 'tclug-list at mn-linux.org'
> > Subject: RE: [TCLUG] ms outlook under WINE?
> >
> > > Wow.  why in the world would a person need/want/think about
> > > 50K messages
> > > in a mailbox?
> >
> > I'm on many different mailing lists for various software
> > packages, security lists, and other things.  Plus, I get
> > several hundred emails a week from people I work with on
> > various issues.  I get nearly 1000 messages a day, and most
> > get deleted.  I delete what I can do without, but I really
> > need to keep as much around as possible in case I need to
> > look back on it.  I lost about 3 months of mail from late
> > 1999, and I find myself needing to go back and find stuff
> > from then fairly often.  My mailbox tends to act as my memory
> > for almost all of my work related stuff.  If I delete
> > something, chances are I will forget the details of it 3 months later.
> >
> > One of the Kmail developers told me that Outlook uses IMAP to
> > pull mail from an exchange server, but I think he's wrong.
> > Outlook connects to ports 1225 and 1226 on the exchange
> > server, not the IMAP port.  Exchange sends notifications to
> > the client when new mail arrives also, with IMAP, you have to
> > check every few minutes.  Having the scheduling, mail, task
> > lists, and other things all together is actually nice once
> > you've gotten used to it. I'm much more productive now that I
> > was at my last company where we had separate systems for
> > everything, and no integrated scheduling.  I think the
> > concept of Exchange/Lotus Notes is right, but the
> > implementations suck. Outlook is bloated and slow, Exchange
> > is buggy, Notes just plain sucks ass in all respects (except
> > for the "runs on Solaris" part).  PHPGroupware is nice, but
> > the requirement of a web interface to use it sucks, although,
> > I think they are working on a KDE or GNOME client that just
> > pulls and posts XML in the background.
> >
> > Isn't The Kompany working on an integrated system for
> > Aethera?  Or was that the gnome people for Evolution?  Right
> > now, there are no open standards for this type of thing, and
> > there needs to be.  Even better, whatever kind of server that
> > ends up getting developed for linux needs to have some sort
> > of connector to MS Exchange so companies could have a nice
> > easy migration path, instead of just tearing out one system
> > and replacing it with another.  And it also needs to have
> > some sort of clustering/redundancy built in.  Notes and
> > Exchange have a rather poor implementation of clustering, but
> > it does work, and it will most likely save your ass if one of
> > the servers dies/crashes/explodes.  I know I wouldn't
> > implement any kind of mailserver solution in a large
> > corporate environment without some sort of failover
> > (preferably transparent).  Failover should be easy, just
> > replicate every database transaction to your standby server,
> > and use tools from the linuxHA project to do the actual
> > failover monitoring.  I don't know how easy it is to
> > replicate both ways, but if it was easy, setting up a cluster
> > using the linux virtual server would be fairly trivial also.
> >
> > Bah, enough of my ranting.  I have work to do.  In fact, work
> > to do on mailservers, something which I'm quite sick of.
> >
> > Jay
> >
> > > duncan
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St.
> > > Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org
> > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> > > https://mailman.mn-> linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St.
> > Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org
> > tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> > https://mailman.mn-> linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St.
> > Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org
> > tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> > https://mailman.mn-> linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul,
> Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org
> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list

-- 
Bret Baptist
Systems and Technical Support Specialist
bbaptist at iexposure.com
Internet Exposure, Inc.
http://www.iexposure.com
 
(612)676-1946 x17
Web Development-Web Marketing-ISP Services
------------------------------------------

-- Missiles of ligneous or osteal consistency have the 
potential of fracturing osseous structure, but appellations 
will eternally remain innocuous.