Call me crazy, but I read the MS proposed settlement. Ok, I read it, didn't get much from it, so read it again after reading this: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20011206.html In particular this Section III(J)(2), if Cringely is right, this is very, very bad. Anyone with a better understanding of legal-speak? The proposed settlement makes LISP look easy to read. -- Minneapolis St. Paul Twin Cities MN | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org Minnesota Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 Key fingerprint = 6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9