On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:46:21AM -0800, Paul Harris wrote:
> Because it's ... umm ... stable.  :) OK, that's a bit lame because
> 2.4 seems to have proven itself by now, but Debian is deliberately
> conservative, and therefore dependable (Kind of like Strom Thurmond?
> - not necesarily what you want, but at least you know what it is.
> The conservative bit translates directly).

So we have the following relations:

 stable => Bush
 frozen => Gore
 unstable => Nader

?  :-)

-- 
johntrammell at yahoo.com | 78BA 706C C5F9 9321 E7C4 933B D063 907B A88E 924B
Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List (TCLUG)
Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota  http://www.mn-linux.org