On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 10:17, Robert Leduc wrote:
> 1)  The new partition need not be bootable; can I ignore this
> 1024 cylinder limit thing then?

Yup.

> 2)  Does my version of Win98 or my bios place restrictions on the
> size of the partition I can create?  Where would I look to find
> an answer?

Nope.

> 3) I tentatively tried to use RH's fdisk to create a new
> partition but didn't save the partition table.  I couldn't see
> how to make it of type "Win95 VFAT" rather than of type "Linux".  
> Should this be a worry or does this change after somehow
> formatting the new partition?  Maybe what I need is a rough
> outline of which commands I need to consider executing?  Note, RH
> 7.2 doesn't seem to ship with cfdisk, more's the pity.

You use the "t" command to change the type of a partition in fdisk.

> 4) For example, what is the linux command for "formatting" the
> drive as FAT32?

Formatting the drive under Linux is not recommended. After creating the
partition with fdisk, you should reboot and format under Windows.

> 5) When I create this new partition, the linux drive assignments
> hda1 -- hda9 or so won't be in order based on the cylinders they
> occupy.  I can reorder this using fdisk.  Should I?  If so, I
> realize I will have to change my /etc/fstab to reflect the new
> numbering.  Are there any other places I'd need to change things?
> I use grub as a boot loader; since /boot and / won't move I
> assume it will still work regardless.

It's ok to have partitions in the wrong order. Fdisk may warn you about
it, but there is nothing dangerous about it.

> 6) My hope is that if I ever need to increase the size of /, I
> could use partition magic to reduce the size of the new windows
> partition and then do a linux reinstall and create a new, larger
> / (likely to occur only in a future upgrade of the operating
> system from cdrom).  I only have partition magic ver 4, but would
> upgrade to 5 if that is necessary.  Would this work or is this a
> bad idea?  People tend to avoid making promises about fips, but
> would fips be a better alternative?

I heartily recommend GNU parted. It can do everything Partition Magic
can do, and it's free.

> Thanks very much for any help on any of the above.

You're welcome!