I was told by a fellow LUG'er that BeroFTPd fixed many of the security vulnerabilities in wu-ftpd. Jon Reuter "Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote: > > If I am not mistaken, BeroFTPd is a direct derivative of wu-ftpd (and > therefore the original BSD ftpd). Thus most holes that wu-ftpd has are > going to be found in BeroFTPd as well - and probably take longer to fill. > > Tom Veldhouse > veldy at veldy.net > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jon V. Reuter" <jreuter at reuter-engineering.com> > To: <tclug-list at mn-linux.org> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 7:11 PM > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] ftp daemons > > > I'm using BeroFTPd and it's working well. > > > > Jon Reuter > > > > > > "Austad, Jay" wrote: > > > > > > What's everyone using for an ftp daemon? It seems like new holes in > wu-ftpd > > > come out nearly as often as holes in sendmail, anyone have a better > > > solution? Proftpd? ncftpd looks sweet, too bad it costs $$$. > > > > > > Jay > > > _______________________________________________ > > > tclug-list mailing list > > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > _______________________________________________ > > tclug-list mailing list > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list