On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:23:23PM -0500, Daniel Taylor wrote:
>Yep, the BSD-Public Domain License. Without the advertising requirement it
>is a dead on givaway, freebie, handout. That is why the Corporations love
>it so much. It lets them take your work without giving _ANY_ recompense.
>
>I'll stick with GPL thank-you-very-much.

But under the terms of the GPL you can't charge royalties and such
anyway. 

>
>Dan
>
>On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Ben Lutgens wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 06:39:51PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
>> 
>> >You say that as if its a bad thing.
>> 
>> Depending on your point of view it can be a bad thing. The BSD people
>> like thier license because it lets people do whatever they want, now if
>> you introduce GPL code into a BSDL piece of code the entire thing then mu
>> become GPL if you wish to leave the GPL stuff in it.
>> 
>> And this is what RMS thinks freedom is. 
>> 
>> Yes, I think the GPL bites WRT to this sort of thing. THat's why I prefer
>> the BSD license.
>> 
>> >
>> >Linux -- Viral and proud of it.
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >tclug-list mailing list
>> >tclug-list at mn-linux.org
>> >https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ben Lutgens		
>> Sistina Software Inc.	
>> Kernel panic: I have no root and I want to scream
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>tclug-list mailing list
>tclug-list at mn-linux.org
>https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list

-- 
Ben Lutgens		
Sistina Software Inc.	
Kernel panic: I have no root and I want to scream
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20010705/8c2edb7d/attachment.pgp