On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:23:23PM -0500, Daniel Taylor wrote: >Yep, the BSD-Public Domain License. Without the advertising requirement it >is a dead on givaway, freebie, handout. That is why the Corporations love >it so much. It lets them take your work without giving _ANY_ recompense. > >I'll stick with GPL thank-you-very-much. But under the terms of the GPL you can't charge royalties and such anyway. > >Dan > >On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Ben Lutgens wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 06:39:51PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: >> >> >You say that as if its a bad thing. >> >> Depending on your point of view it can be a bad thing. The BSD people >> like thier license because it lets people do whatever they want, now if >> you introduce GPL code into a BSDL piece of code the entire thing then mu >> become GPL if you wish to leave the GPL stuff in it. >> >> And this is what RMS thinks freedom is. >> >> Yes, I think the GPL bites WRT to this sort of thing. THat's why I prefer >> the BSD license. >> >> > >> >Linux -- Viral and proud of it. >> >_______________________________________________ >> >tclug-list mailing list >> >tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> >https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> >> -- >> Ben Lutgens >> Sistina Software Inc. >> Kernel panic: I have no root and I want to scream >> > >_______________________________________________ >tclug-list mailing list >tclug-list at mn-linux.org >https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -- Ben Lutgens Sistina Software Inc. Kernel panic: I have no root and I want to scream -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20010705/8c2edb7d/attachment.pgp