Eh, lemme ammend that a spot. The implementation of legal+technical
appears to be mostly well done (from the viewpoint of MegaCo) and that's
my point. I don't however, subscribe to the idea that this particular
legal implementation should have ever seen the light of day.

Josh

On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Joshua Jore wrote:

> Eh, perhaps media encryption isn't as flawed as we think it is. Obviously
> it's a technical barrier that can be surmounted. That much is obvious and
> perhaps MegaCo is still deluding itself about that. I'm of the mind that
> mostly this isn't a big issue for them. I think the major part of
> encryption is so they can go sue your ass a dozen ways to Sunday and have
> some big legal ammo to do it with.
>
> Josh
>
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:11:16PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> > > And its been pretty well proven already that encryption of media formats
> > > is fundamentally flawed.
> >
> > Try explaining that to the people who want the encryption.  Either
> > they haven't noticed yet or they just don't care.
> > _______________________________________________
> > tclug-list mailing list
> > tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
> >
>
>