Eh, lemme ammend that a spot. The implementation of legal+technical appears to be mostly well done (from the viewpoint of MegaCo) and that's my point. I don't however, subscribe to the idea that this particular legal implementation should have ever seen the light of day. Josh On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Joshua Jore wrote: > Eh, perhaps media encryption isn't as flawed as we think it is. Obviously > it's a technical barrier that can be surmounted. That much is obvious and > perhaps MegaCo is still deluding itself about that. I'm of the mind that > mostly this isn't a big issue for them. I think the major part of > encryption is so they can go sue your ass a dozen ways to Sunday and have > some big legal ammo to do it with. > > Josh > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:11:16PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > > And its been pretty well proven already that encryption of media formats > > > is fundamentally flawed. > > > > Try explaining that to the people who want the encryption. Either > > they haven't noticed yet or they just don't care. > > _______________________________________________ > > tclug-list mailing list > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > >