Nah, that's actually pretty cool. There's been a few times where I've
seriously disagreed with how the tracks were mixed. It's not often enough
to make it worth sacrificing 400 hours at 1track -> 400 tracks at 1 hour.

Josh

On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Brian wrote:

> On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
>
> > 	a reader later wrote in, proposing that instead of storing 400+
> > hours of music; why not store 400+ tracks, for an hour each? have a separate
> > track for each of the instruments in an orchestra; and be able to rearrange
> > them spatially, adjust volume, etc., on an individual or sectional basis.
>
> You know, I can't count the number of times I've listened to songs that I
> wish I could dump the individual tracks into software, tweak them, and
> rebuild a CD mixed to my personal taste.  The majority of people I know
> wouldn't care but I'm a rythym kinda guy so when I here a song with a
> really nice rythym guitar being too masked out by an obnoxious lead
> guitar.  Then again, I'm kinda anal when it comes to this stuff so maybe
> I'm alone..
>
> -Brian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tclug-list mailing list
> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>