Nah, that's actually pretty cool. There's been a few times where I've seriously disagreed with how the tracks were mixed. It's not often enough to make it worth sacrificing 400 hours at 1track -> 400 tracks at 1 hour. Josh On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Brian wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote: > > > a reader later wrote in, proposing that instead of storing 400+ > > hours of music; why not store 400+ tracks, for an hour each? have a separate > > track for each of the instruments in an orchestra; and be able to rearrange > > them spatially, adjust volume, etc., on an individual or sectional basis. > > You know, I can't count the number of times I've listened to songs that I > wish I could dump the individual tracks into software, tweak them, and > rebuild a CD mixed to my personal taste. The majority of people I know > wouldn't care but I'm a rythym kinda guy so when I here a song with a > really nice rythym guitar being too masked out by an obnoxious lead > guitar. Then again, I'm kinda anal when it comes to this stuff so maybe > I'm alone.. > > -Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >