Trolltek (Qt) claims that applications developed with their Qt can be ported to both Linux or MSWindows. The MSWindows Qt libraries and classes are licensed, however (Surprise!). They claim this is an advantage for developers to serve both markets with the same application development. At least that is their pitch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 7/13/01, 1:00:28 AM, Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> wrote regarding [TCLUG] Hmmm, comments GNOME vs KDE & .NET vs .GNU.sdm: > http://www.osopinion.com/perl/story/11967.html > As I started to read this, I thought "rant" and "flamebait", but then the topic > turned to .GNU and to tell your the truth, I read Ximians press release, I > thought why? Why -follow- microsoft? > So I re-read the GNOME vs KDE part. Since I have been doing Java for months now, > I don't dip into gtk vs qt stuff. > I know this is probably flamebait, but I find GNOME -and- KDE both very good > from a user stand point. > Anyone care to comment on GNOME vs KDE from an developer prospective? > -- > Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 > http://www.mn-linux.org | Fax : (952)943-8500 > Key fingerprint = 6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9 > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list