> An intriguing article about how the RBOCs may have intentionally > caused problems and delays in the process of installing DSL equipment > to support ISPs. This is exactly why 'big' companies like AT&T avoided lots of 'residential' dsl stuff and just bought a whole ton of companies with existing, upgradable local infrastructure on a 'packet-based' network that doesn't have 'terrifed' services yet. (It will happen, sooner than later) It's quite amusing that they've gotten this far without starting another witch-hunt. :) -- Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org> <sdier at debian.org> http://www.ringworld.org/ #linuxos at irc.openprojects.net