> An intriguing article about how the RBOCs may have intentionally 
> caused problems and delays in the process of installing DSL equipment 
> to support ISPs.

This is exactly why 'big' companies like AT&T avoided lots of
'residential' dsl stuff and just bought a whole ton of companies with
existing, upgradable local infrastructure on a 'packet-based' network
that doesn't have 'terrifed' services yet. (It will happen, sooner than
later)

It's quite amusing that they've gotten this far without starting another
witch-hunt. :)

-- 
Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org> <sdier at debian.org>
http://www.ringworld.org/  #linuxos at irc.openprojects.net