On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Chad C. Walstrom wrote: > Sounds like you've got a good handle on what these many important > logistical considerations might be. Why not put your fingers to > keyboard and write up your "formal proposal", because obviously, we're > your "code monkeys." *My* code monkeys? _I_ don't need any code. Nor do _I_ need LUG library. Silly me, I thought making some literature available would be a benefit to some LUG members, and that some might be willing to actually step forward and DO something to facilitate it. Instead, the response is a sarcasm-filled flame prompted by my suggestion that we direct the discussion on the original thread to actually accomplishing something. I'm sure you're capable of building a kickass application without actually knowing ahead of time what it is. I'm just sorry it was too much effort for you to take that tangent to another thread. I WAS intending to donate a lot of material that I had on hand -- a few dozen books beyond the stack of magazines that prompted my first note -- as well as several thousand dollars worth of books in the near future that I normally turn down from authors and editors whom I know. But you've single-handedly thwarted my selfish plan, thanks to your need to saturate the issue with piss & vinegar. But by all means, don't let that stop you from exercising your right to discuss. Andy