I've used Litestep quite successfully at work. I just switched back to explorer but that was only so my co-workers could cope with my pc if they needed to use it while I was on vacation. The core litestep is really just a set of DLLs and an executable. I've found that the hardest part is finding a theme that you like and that works with you. I got the most milage out of the WindowMaker theme after a bunch of modification. I can put my config up for download if anyone is interested. Oh yeah, don't bother doing this on W9x/ME. They just don't play as nice with killing random processes as NT/2k is. When you are first trying litestep out you *will* spend time killing it and trying again. This is highly impractical on 9x since you effectively have to reboot each time. It's dirt easy on NT/2k. Joshua Jore Minneapolis Ward 3, precinct 10 On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Yaron wrote: > Hey, > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Dave Sherman wrote: > > > Litestep (www.litestep.org, net, com) has a nice NextStep feel to it. > > Haven't used it in quite a while, so I can't say as to its stability or > > functionality. Back in the day, though, it was pretty good. > > I tried to install that about 6 months ago. It's setup program > generated some kind of fatal exception while installing. Ended up having > to reinstall Windows since it trashed it so badly. Might have been > recoverable for someone who knows Windoze well enough, but I figure a > warning is in order. > > -Yaron > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >