This is common in the construction industry, I always thought it was a matter of time before it spread to others as well.. I for one, have done a small amount of IT consulting work, and never had a clause like this in it. However, I have worked for small companies where it was understood I would not be paid until they were. But for those I was well-understanding of this fact. -Phil > My contract reads that I will be paid a specific hourly rate for "hours > billable and paid for by <client>." Since Karlsson won't be getting > paid, they *might* not pay me (they are "thinking" about it). From > now on I will not sign a contract for which my pay is determined by the > contract house getting paid. I did the work. I should get the money. > > What do you think? Is that clause normal for contractors? Is that one > of the acceptable risks?