Rant: If the many accepted hosting services can provide on site service, then I would use them. It seems like not enough people wish to host from home to make it a worthwile venture from the $$ side of things. It's not that I want to skip out on giving them money for service, it's just that I want to do something that is not available. I suppose I could move, but I thought Golden Valley would be close enough to a "Big City" to get useable class of service. I guessed wrong. I also guessed that the Internet was a 2 way medium (I guessed wrong on that point as well). I suppose active ftp is bad as well as the requests are coming in as well (or is it passive ftp) oh well you know what I mean... Kelly Black KB0GBJ On Wednesday 16 January 2002 00:10, you wrote: Snip----- > service provided users follow certain policies. I don't think this > business model is new to anyone. When this certain class of bandwidth use > is specified and allowed by AT&T, host to your hearts content. Until then, > pay to use the many accepted hosting services. Nuff said. >