I have been looking for a "good" replacement for exchange and there isn't one. All the alternatives mentioned here are fine for your average linux user who can handle and deal with office applications that arn't Microsoft based. Your average user however is going to curse your name if you stick them with something "Bizzare" I hate to admit it but bizzare just about sums it up for the alternatives out there. (Oracle 91as server has a mail component that supposedly can take the place of an exchange database, but that's probably costs more than exchange) Anyone know about this? Ironically Exchanges Calendaring lacks a key feature that most larger businesses are looking for. That being assett managment. For example you have a conferance room that you want users to be able to schedule time for. You either have to play with public folders or create a user account for the conferance room. That alone confuses most end users so you can imagine what it would be like having them run an IMAP mail client then going to a web page for a calendar or opening 3 or 4 different apps depending on the solution. On Wednesday 24 July 2002 10:51, you wrote: > Deja Vu???? Bite the bullet, Exchange is alright. And remember, > THERE IS NO OPEN SOURCE REPLACEMENT WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY OF > EXCHANGE. If you gotta have Unix look at Notes. And I am pretty > sure the CEO didn't call it "outpuke". The variants M$, Micro$oft, > Microborg, Lookout, Outpuke, etc... make Linux users/advocates look > like zealots. > > Grow up. Join the workforce, realize that he who pays the bills > makes the rules. In case you haven't realized, Microsoft shops are > hireing about 10 to 1 compared to Unix shops. Chances are you will > have to support at least some Microsoft products, why not make the > best of it and realize that not everything they have done has been > bad. No, Exchange is not as flexible as Sendmail, nor is it as > difficult to use, nor has it had the pitiful security record of > Sendmail. Sendmail, while an ass kicking smpt mailer has nothing to > offer corporate America looking for calandering/scheduling. > > There is no "best" anything, there is "more" and "less" suitable for > the task at hand. Linux is really only a free version of Unix, it > doesn't scale on up as Unix will, isn't as stable, fault tolerant > (yet or maybe ever) as most Unixes. All it is, is cheaper, and it > will run on commodity hardware. Step away from the alter of Linux > long enough to realize this. WTF is it about *nix that creates > zealots. I have never met anyone in the Microsoft camp that is a > zealot about Microsoft to the extent that some members of the *nix > camp are zealots about *nix. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christopher A. Gahlon [SMTP:cgahlon at citilink.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:16 AM > > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > Subject: [TCLUG] Help! The boss wants an exchange server!!! > > > > Help!!! The CEO has just mandiated unified calendaring/scheduling > > for our > > company. And unless I can find a viable alternative he says I'll > > be stuck > > supporting exchange and outpuke. > > > > I had looked at HP openmail about a year ago but they had stoppped > > > > development. Are there any viable alternatives now that will sync > > with > > various PDA's? Any suggestions opensouce or commercial would be > > greatly > > appreciated. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > Christopher Gahlon > > Systems Admin > > Caribou Lake Software > > _______________________________________________ > > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, > > Minnesota > > http://www.mn-linux.org > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, > Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -- ----------------------------- |\/|ike at GetBent.net