I thought scheduling was pretty neat to, until I tried to get my companions at work to use it. They were rarely interested. And unless everyone keeps all their schedule on it, no deal. It was like this in 3 different companies. Sometimes there is a big gap between neat and usable. Florin Iucha wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 11:34:15AM -0500, Kelly Black wrote: > > Has anybody out there looked at this one: > > http://www.r-goetz.de/minkowsky/en/ > > > > screenshots here: > > http://www.r-goetz.de/minkowsky/screenshots.html > > > > I know it does not run with the mail client (it is a standalone Tcl/Tk app > > and therefore can run on almost anything with Tcl/Tk and Tix can run on). > > > > It looks cool (although only at a 0.51 in the development scheme of things). > > Changelogs indicate a release on the 10th of this month (June), and some > > frequent activity since 4/2002, so it seems to be live and active. > > > > I would think de-coupling the mail and schedule functions could be a great > > thing for a company. > > I think not. If you ever used the integration of the mail/address > book/schedule in Outlook you wouldn't settle for less. You can look at > your to-do list, decide you need a meeting, retrieve the schedules of > the attendees and find a good time for all, click a couple of buttons > and send them the meeting invitation, they click a couple of buttons and > the meeting place/time is entered in their schedules. Slick. > > I despise Outlook for a bunch of reasons but they got that right. > > florin > > -- > > "If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is." > > 41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature -- Wayne Johnson, | There are two kinds of people: Those 3943 Penn Ave. N. | who say to God, "Thy will be done," Minneapolis, MN 55412-1908 | and those to whom God says, "All right, (612) 522-7003 | then, have it your way." --C.S. Lewis