On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:29:32PM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote: > Anyone know why Cisco EOL'd the 67x? > > I mean they had a monopoly in places like Qworst land. Why kill the the product? Phase out CBOS? EOL doesn't mean dead, at least for a few years, anyway. I'll still use my Cisco 675 for a couple years to come at least. -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> | a.k.a. ^chewie http://www.wookimus.net/ | s.k.a. gunnarr Get my public key, ICQ#, etc. $(mailx -s 'get info' chewie at wookimus.net) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020319/a0595844/attachment.pgp