> Quoting David Dyer-Bennet (dd-b at dd-b.net): > > Whatcha got against daemontools? I see less reason to > object to them > > than to qmail; while I use and like qmail, I can see why it wouldn't > > fit other environments well. But daemontools really do their nice > > simple job very cleanly. However, if your mind's made up > never mind. > > Many people have issue with DJB's view of the world. I run daemontools on several of my boxes for various things, and while it does work, I have problems with it looping and starting a whole bunch of the same process sometimes. In this particular case, I need to have something that *won't* screw up because of the nature of what this particular process does. Jay > -- > Minneapolis St. Paul Twin Cities MN | Phone : (952)943-8700 > http://www.mn-linux.org Minnesota Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 > Key fingerprint = 6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9 > > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. > Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >