Give me a set of random data, let me draw any continuous sample from it, and I can prove anything you want. This report uses a momentary surge in reports of vulnerabilities in OSS projects to assert a conclusion that is not borne out by a larger data sample (say including 2001 numbers or the portions of 2002 that have yet to come). Expect a significant number of MS security vulnerability reports now that they have "proven" that they are more secure. -- Daniel Taylor dante at plethora.net On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Justin Kremer wrote: > My dad sent this link to me. > Wondering what y'all have to say about it. > > http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/19996.html > > According to them we're more susceptible to security threats than windows > users...why do I find myself doubting their credibility? > Maybe it has something to do with the fact that they link to companies > home pages, and to their own articles, but not actually to any place that > confirms their information. > - Kremer > > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >