Quoting Thomas T. Veldhouse (veldy at veldy.net): > Can anybody here say whether reiserfs has stabalized enough in the 2.4 > kernel to safely use on a server (low load) versus using ext3 or ext2? I > have seen a similar question being batted around other lists, but I have not > heard a whole lot of real world experience, and this list probably has > members with more of that than most. One of the biggest complaints for reiserfs is that none of the repair/recovery tools we use has reiserfs built-in by default. Tom's R/B, BBC, RH recovery all need to be tweaked to get them to support resiserfs (please correct me if I'm wrong). This is why we have stuck to ext3. -- Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 http://www.tcwug.org, Minnesota, Wireless | Coding isn't a crime. Fingerprint: 02E0 2734 A1A1 DBA1 0E15 623D 0036 7327 93D9 7DA3