I'm running a dual Pentium III 800 and a dual Athlon 1800+ as corporate application, file, and print servers, and they both perform extremely well. The Athlon is much faster than the Pentium, as it should be. The Pentium box has been running continuously for a bit over a year, the Athlon for about 2 months. I wouldn't hesitate to go with a dual MB, Athlon or otherwise. Brian wrote: > I'm building an uber-number crunching box for a guy. He wants the best in > everything, so naturaly I recomended an Athlon MP machine. he had a few > choice words to say about the dual MPs, and wanted a single Athlon > instead. He wouldn't tell me WHY, other than "I've heard things". > > Is Athlon MP a good choice? Are there weird issues under various > OS's? (this box will be running dual Win2K/Linux). > > -Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > >