On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 11:11:03AM -0500, Munir Nassar wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Bob Tanner wrote:
> 
> > This is an official notice.
> > 
> > Please keep your post related to linux, (and related technologies), open 
> > source, networking, etc. 
> 
> i do not think that this is a good idea, 
> 
> what about BSD? there a a couple of BSD users around here (hey gabe!) and 
> how about MacOSX(hey spencet!) is it covered too?
> 
> how about someone implementing samba on the server side, and he has a 
> client side question can they?

Munir, read Bob's snippet.

> how about .sigs? they kinda started this, are they supposed to conform 
> too?

I was expecting a statement about this too...
> 
> are we going to have a "list" of approved subjects we can talk about? 
> kinda reminds me of the "list" of approved websites chinese people can go 
> to

I think Bob wanted to go that far, but as list owner he was invited to make a
statement.

Common sense should apply, although the "common" part is less than it 
is thought to be.

florin

-- 

"If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is."

41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6  03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020915/0eca92c9/attachment.pgp