Bob Tanner wrote:
> From tclug-list-admin at mn-linux.org  Sun Sep 29 15:58:28 2002
> Return-Path: <tclug-list-admin at mn-linux.org>
> Received: from sprite.real-time.com (lists.real-time.com [208.20.202.12])
>         by zjod.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8TKwR511133
>         for <sos at zjod.net>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:58:28 -0500
> Received: from sprite.real-time.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>         by sprite.real-time.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8TKuOK26432;
>         Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:56:25 -0500
> Received: from gatekeeper.real-time.com (gatekeeper.real-time.com [65.193.16.100])
>         by sprite.real-time.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8TKPYK26146
>         for <tclug-list at mn-linux.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:25:34 -0500
> Received: from guardian.castle.real-time.com by gatekeeper.real-time.com
>           via smtpd (for lists.real-time.com [208.20.202.12]) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 20:11:01 U
> T
> Received: from hazlan.ravenloft.real-time.com ([192.168.201.245])
>         by mail.castle.real-time.com with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #5 (Red Hat Linux))
>         id 17vkdH-0002u5-00
>         for <tclug-list at mn-linux.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:25:39 -0500
> Received: from tanner by hazlan.ravenloft.real-time.com with local (Exim 3.36 #5)
>         id 17vkhG-0003V3-00
>         for tclug-list at mn-linux.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:29:46 -0500
> From: Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com>
> To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> Message-ID: <20020929152946.V20409 at real-time.com>
<SNIP>
> X-Original-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:29:46 -0500
> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:29:46 -0500
> Status: RO
> 
> There is something very wrong with the mail server. I'm not sure what it is. I
> see posts come in and (supposedly go out), but I'm not getting them in my inbox.
> 
> I see the logs show 
> 
>         delay=00:00:06, xdelay=00:00:05
> 
> So, it's not being delay too long.
> 
> Anyone have any ideas?
> 
> Sent this 09/29/2002 at 15:30
> 

Check the various timestamps in the email headers as I received 'em.  Note how many
hops seem to be received "in the future".  As I recall, this is a problem for some
mail handlers.

I'm kinda surprised that real-time.com isn't using nntp'idly,

-S