On Wed, 09 Apr 2003, Bob Tanner wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2003 01:37 am, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:56:13PM -0500, Bob Tanner wrote: > > > Redhat 9 is aptified. > > > > > > I'm still using 0.5.4, so I'm not 100% sure if that is compatible with > > > 0.5.5 release of apt. > > > > it wasn't when i last tried, you'll get into a problem where rpm completely > > breaks -- requiring a > > rpm --force --nodeps <old version of rpm> > > > > grab the new apt from freshrpms and real-time-ify it =) > > I would, but I saw on the apt-rpm ml, that 0.5.5cnc4.1 has a vicious bug in it > that can corrupt your rpm database (rare circumstance) and a new release is > forth coming. > Heh, I guess I am rare since I've been having this problem non-stop. I was pulling my hair out trying to figure out what I did wrong. Luckily I found this, which is probably what Bob is referring to: http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/apt-list/2003-March/000013.html _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list