It seems to me MySQL really shines as a dbms to backend your website if you have very modest needs or maybe load out of Oracle or SQL Server into this for use on the web to get around the internet connector fee of the commercial dbms's. MySQL was designed to be fast first anything else takes a back seat to speed. -----Original Message----- From: Glenn McDavid [mailto:gmcdavid at attbi.com] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:42 AM To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org Subject: RE: [TCLUG] moving away from oracle On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 RWare at INTERPLASTIC.com wrote: > Does MySQL have stored procs and sub queries yet? Row level locking? Last > time I looked it didn't. Postgres was miles ahead of it before as far as > features and atomicity which Phil G writes a fair amount about. I think this is decisive, if you actually have an existing body of PL-SQL code to migrate. Last I looked MySQL was lacking a lot of SQL features that have been around a long time--stuff that I was using 10 years ago. You are likely to find MySQL very frustrating in this situation, and at best you will end up with a lot of kludgy code. I don't know much about PostGres, but the last time I checked it was a much more complete SQL implementation. Glenn McDavid gmcdavid at attbi.com gmcdavid at winternet.com http://www.winternet.com/~gmcdavid/ _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list