On Wednesday 30 April 2003 10:21 am, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 10:19:16AM -0500, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote:
> > Actually it's not all that hard, just tack on an X-No-Archive: Yes to
> > your messages, and '
> >
> > :0:
> >
> > * ^X-No-Archive: Yes
> > /dev/null
> > '
> > to the archive procmailrc.
>
> The question is "Do we have an archive procmailrc?"  I believe we're
> using mailman w/o any procmail intervention.  Can anyone clarify this?

Chewie is correct. It's pipermail doing the archiving and I do not think it 
obeys the X-No-Archive smtp header.

-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com>         | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax   : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42  1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288

_______________________________________________
TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org
https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list