On Wednesday 30 April 2003 10:21 am, Chad Walstrom wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 10:19:16AM -0500, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote: > > Actually it's not all that hard, just tack on an X-No-Archive: Yes to > > your messages, and ' > > > > :0: > > > > * ^X-No-Archive: Yes > > /dev/null > > ' > > to the archive procmailrc. > > The question is "Do we have an archive procmailrc?" I believe we're > using mailman w/o any procmail intervention. Can anyone clarify this? Chewie is correct. It's pipermail doing the archiving and I do not think it obeys the X-No-Archive smtp header. -- Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288 _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list