Matthew S. Hallacy writes: > Really? What information does it destroy? Most Reply-To munging turns > any previous Reply-To into X-Reply-To preserving the information. How many clients actually support that feature? Do you expect people to look at the headers before replying to you? > As for making it 'much more difficult', what email client *doesn't* > have a 'Reply To Sender' function? I am the sender of this message. Without Reply-To munging, you would simply use the "Reply To Sender" function to reply to me. With Reply-To munging, you need to somehow instruct your mail client to reply to my address (perhaps a "Reply to From" feature that knows about X-Reply-To). > What information is destroyed? A large majority of replies to messages > on this list go to the list, as opposed to the original author. What > is broken for people with 'good MUAs'? "Reply To Sender" is broken, as stated above. How do you know a large majority of replies go to the list? Unless you know about all mail that all list members send, it is impossible to determine. -- David Phillips <david at acz.org> http://david.acz.org/ _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list