On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 08:51:19AM -0800, Duncan Shannon wrote: > > > > >[much biased] > > > >I believe apache.org is much of a testimony to Apache being able to handle > >the load for whatever Duncan can throw at it 1). > >What Duncan needs to make sure is that he has the pipe that can serve it > >and as you point out, enough memory to have enough childs running. > > > >1) http://www.apache.org/server-status > > 3788 GB over the last 20 days, which is about 8 GB/hour or about 2MB/s > > (byte, not bit). And this is without a new release within those 20 days > > afair) > > wow. thats a lot of traffic. I really hope we dont have that much, or > well go broke! Just see it get even worse when they release a new version. > any special considerations to keep in mind hardware wise? was thinking > some fast drives, in raid10, and that CPU wouldnt really matter all that > much. am i off? I don't really think it will matter much, at home I have two machines I max out 100mbit with scp between them. And that's just between some ide drives. And those machines are only PIII 1GHz's (one only has 128MB mem). _______________________________________________ Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list