I completely agree with both of you that the Cisco 678 is a better piece of machinery. I actually have one sitting right next to me, but I can't find a 5V/1.5A power supply for it. :-( This is the only problem I have had with the ActionTec, so I am hoping this could be fixed and all would be fine. I am trying to get an output of the NAT tables but I can't get the router to crash now! Grm! Everytime I try to post important stuff it crashes repeatedly and now when I want it to crash for diagnostic purposes nothing happens. I will report back in a day or so when it's bound to crash with some router outputs (I call it crashing when it blocks me from the remote machine). Thanks, Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam MacDonald" <smac at visi.com> To: "TCLUG Mailing List" <tclug-list at mn-linux.org> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 9:21 AM Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Actiontec blocking single remote computer > My 2 cents. > > I've only used a Cisco 678 DSL modem for a full time DSL connection. It > is solid as a rock, I've never had an issue like you've described. Most > ISP's use Cisco equipment, in my ignorant thinking I would want to use > the same equipment my ISP is using. Because it was engineered to work > together by the company that made it. > > Sam. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list