On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Eric Stanley wrote: > I guess the reason I like IAX better is because it can cross a NATting > firewall with port forwarding on a single (I think) port. IAX is great. Like you said, it traverses NAT nicely, doesn't require a proxy at all, and is totally open. > I use an X100P clone on the telco side. I tried to buy it from Digium > (because I believe in supporting the Asterisk effort), but after 5 calls > to them in 4 weeks, I gave up. I wish you better luck. I also bought a clone card. Not actually using it yet, though. :) > On the phone side, I'm trying to get a Sipura SPA-2000 working. I've got the Sipura working just fine, also have a Pingtel Xpressa working. Eventually want to pick up a Cisco 7960 and a Polycom IP phone, and try them out. You do certainly get more features with a IP hardphone than an analog adapter (such as the ATA/Sipura), but it is also much more expensive. -- Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (952)943-8500 _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list