Actually ... I am sticking with the same hardware .. just upgrading the software. So ... I can back up things easily to another Linux box on the network .. but I was actually hoping (risky) to just do the upgrade and not do the backup (lazy) Randy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad Juettner" <chad at bitstream.net> To: "Randy Clarksean" <rclark at lakesplus.com>; "TCLUG Mailing List" <tclug-list at mn-linux.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [TCLUG] RH upgrade and H.323 in newer kernels > Randy Clarksean wrote: > > > For a newer version of RH ... will my iptables firewall come across > > without any trouble? > > > > Does anyone know if the H.323 issue has been addressed anywhere along > > the line - other than with a gatekeeper type approach? I would like > > to enhance my video conferencing capabilities at some point without > > spending a ton of time troubleshooting an install (wastes my time and > > someone else's time to work through fixes). > > Your iptables rules should come across just fine. Either copy your > existing script to the new box or copy the output of the iptables-save > command to the new machine. The only thing that might bite you in the > ass is if the interfaces on the new box are on different networks than > the old (ex: eth0 is now the public interface and it used to be the > internal/private). > > Looks like there's a patch available for H.323 support at > http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-extra.html#pom-extra-h323-conntrack-nat. > > Hope that helps. > > -- > Chad Juettner > chad at bitstream.net > _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list