OK, so it looks like SIG's will be well received by TCLUG. Currently, we have 525 people listed on the TCLUG membership page. This may not reflect the active participation of the group, but it's a good metric to start from. We're big! It's time for TCLUG SIG's! In truth, we already have an informal SIG, the tclug-devel list, or more formally now, the Developer's SIG. Since I started the ball rolling, and I'm trying to organize the TCLUG BSP, I'll volunteer to Chair the Debian SIG. IMPLEMENTATION DETAIL: THE LIST =============================== I remember reading once that Mailman 2.1.x had topic filters. Here's the description from the NEWS file: - Topic Filters o A new feature has been added called "Topic Filters". A list administrator can create topics, which are essentially regular expression matches against Subject: and Keyword: headers (including such pseudo-headers if they appear in the first few lines of the body of a message). List members can then `subscribe' to various topics, which allows them to filter out any messages that don't match a topic, or to filter out any message that does match a topic. This can be useful for high volume lists where not everyone will be interested in every message. This work was sponsored by Control.com I think this would work well and coincide with Sam's suggestion of forums. I did find at least one website[1] that describes using this feature of Mailman[2]. In practice, we should be able to specify a keyword in the "Subject:" or "Keywords:" headers. List members can then "subscribe" to certain topic filters. For example, we typically use OT or OFF-TOPIC to signify non-Linux topics. These filters would allow users to block these posts. IMPLEMENTATION DETAIL: THE WEBSITE ================================== I suppose we should have a SIG's page listing each SIG, their Chairs and officers, etc. References on topics to subscribe to... Appropriate Links of Interest for the SIG. IMPLEMENTATION DETAIL: TCLUG FORMALIZATION ========================================== Should we formalize TCLUG a bit? Add Official Officer Positions? ;-) President, President-Elect, Secretary, Member-at-Large? Should we constitutionalize things loosely around these positions, describing election procedures? i.e. Using Debian's Condorcet election system? Etc. (NOTE: I am not proposing TCLUG as an NPO. Let's avoid that for a while.) References ========== 1. http://www.esosoft.com/support/mailinglist/mailman/topics.html 2. http://www.list.org -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */ _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list