On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Dave Sherohman wrote: > Then again, Stallman's advocated for "Linux" starting with an invisible > (but decidedly not silent...) "GNU", but that doesn't seem to have > caught on. (Thankfully.) It doesn't predominate, but I've heard it fairly often. Linux would not have existed if it weren't for GNU and the GPL. I can understand why Stallman feels a bit ripped off when he started the ball rolling and Torvalds is getting most of the attention. Torvald's contribution looks a lot smaller to me than Stallman's. Mike