I think the point is, if you built your system with GNU, it *can* be GNU/Linux. It doesn't *have* to be though. It sound appropriate, but unnecessary to me. Lots of distro's don't call themselves GNU. -Josh On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:25:07 -0600 (CST), Mike Miller <mbmiller at taxa.epi.umn.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Josh Close wrote: > > > BTW, this should clear it up for all of you. > > > > http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html > > The guy who wrote "No, RMS, Linux is not GNU/Linux"... > > http://librenix.com/?inode=2312 > > ...also wrote "I'm in a bad mood now." There seems to be a lot of anger > against Stallman. When I searched for "not GNU/Linux" I found a bunch of > web pages: > > http://www.google.com/search?q=%22not+gnu%2Flinux%22 > > Mike >