I think the point is, if you built your system with GNU, it *can* be
GNU/Linux. It doesn't *have* to be though. It sound appropriate, but
unnecessary to me.

Lots of distro's don't call themselves GNU.

-Josh

On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:25:07 -0600 (CST), Mike Miller
<mbmiller at taxa.epi.umn.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Josh Close wrote:
> 
> > BTW, this should clear it up for all of you.
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html
> 
> The guy who wrote "No, RMS, Linux is not GNU/Linux"...
> 
> http://librenix.com/?inode=2312
> 
> ...also wrote "I'm in a bad mood now."  There seems to be a lot of anger
> against Stallman.  When I searched for "not GNU/Linux" I found a bunch of
> web pages:
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?q=%22not+gnu%2Flinux%22
> 
> Mike
>