On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:14:24AM -0600, Adam Maloney wrote:
> >I have two subnetworks (10.10.0.0 - 100 Mbit and 10.0.0.0 - Gigabit)
> >separated by a linux server that acts as a router. I am running dhcpd3
> >on the router, but I have a problem with the configuration.
> 
> IIRC, the protocol supports specifying additional routes for the client to 
> install, but not a netmask, so it defaults to classful.  Your route for 
> the 10.0.0.0/24 network would be installed as a /8 in the client.  I just 
> checked and I don't even see this option in ISC DHCP3...
> 
> If this is the case, a workaround would be to set the default gateway on 
> the clients to the Linux router, and let the router reroute the packets to 
> the DSL.  Not 100% optimal since the packets go over the same network 
> twice, but you're talking about a DSL line, I don't think it's going to 
> severely impact performance on a 100M LAN.

I will try this.

> Another option may be to add another NIC to the router and have the router 
> be the real gateway for the DSL.  But this may not be an option depending 
> on the rest of your setup.

Nope - I am out of PCI slots: one for GigE and one for USB 2.0.

florin

-- 

Don't question authority: they don't know either!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20050310/25a786bc/attachment.pgp