On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:43:14PM -0500, Jeremy Rosengren wrote: > So it's somewhat of a purity vs. ease-of-use argument. This is the > only list of the 20 (- 5-10 that I've unsubscribed from) that I > subscribe to that does this, however. I find that hard to believe, but this all depends upon what types of lists you belong to. In my experience, lists with technical users generally shy away from Reply-To munging. I get PISSED off when I have to kill and email draft because the To: field didn't get populated with the original sender of the email. If I reply, I want to reply to the sender. If I Reply All, I want to reply to the list. It seems very logical. Reply All == List. Reply == Invidual. Why screw with logic? > Are there other people on this list who subscribe to a lot of other > mailing lists that are configured the way the TCLUG list is? 90% of them are configured as TCLUG is. And for the ones that aren't, I un-munge them with procmail. Basically, if the To: and Reply-To: are the same, kill the Reply-To. -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */