I've been laboriously marking up html to put information out, but it's so time-consuming that I'm looking for something else. I don't want to blog or wiki or slashdot either. So much of the OSource world seems to be using Latex/Tex or Texinfo and just converting to html, or even pdf or ps. Anyway they have publish-ready manuscript that can instantly become something else like Web pages. Is there a flaw in my logic here? Printing html is dodgy at best (wildly varying font sizes, things cut off, overruns), pdf isn't 100% either. So if my thinking is sound, which is better, easier, used more, Latex/Tex or Texinfo. From googling, I'm finding little on Texinfo, but lots on Latex/Tex. If I go the Latex/Tex route, can I still get Info docs? My goal is quick idea-to-media. I'll face a learning curve, but I want something faster than hand-coding html. One thing I've considered is OpenOffice word processing which has a doc2html and a doc2pdf, but I'm not a fan of all the gew-gaw it throws in an html, and I'd like to stay as GNU-centric as possible. Besides, I like "old" tech until something clearly is better, and a word processor isn't that much improvement, IMHO. Olwe __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com