On Jan 9, 2008 8:03 PM, <auditodd at comcast.net> wrote: > Top post? > Bottom post? > Who gives a flying fart!? > > I'm intelligent enough to figure out the chronological order of a series of emails. > > Just because some web site somewhere shows 1 reason why bottom posting is "supposedly" better does NOT make it LAW. > I'm going to middle post. Screw anybody's convention. > Quite frankly I could care less how someone posts as long as they trim out the excess text that has nothing to do with their reply. > > I also find it interesting that Microsoft is NOT the only software company whose email client top posts by default, so you can't blame it on Microsoft. > > Just my $0.02. > > -- > ========== > Todd Young > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Jim Crumley <crumley at belka.space.umn.edu> > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:45:25PM -0800, Anna Edwards wrote: > > > > First off, top posting to technical email list is bad. Please > > stop. See for example: > > http://catb.org/~esr//jargon/html/T/top-post.html > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -- Donovan Niesen