bnr bnr,

You lose all your geek cred for that message... 

:D

On Jul 3, 2010, at 10:30 AM, bnr bnr wrote:

>  -.--  ---  ..-  +  .-  ...  -.-.  ..  ..  +  .--.  .  ---  .--.
> .-..  .  +  ....  .-  -..  +  -  ---  +  .-.  ..-  ..  -.  +  .-  +
> ...  ..  --  .--.  .-..  .  +  .-..  ---  -.  --.  +  -..  ..  ...  -
> .-  -.  -.-.  .  +  -.-.  ---  --  --  ..-  -.  ..  -.-.  .-  -  ..
> ---  -.  +  --  .  -  ....  ---  -..  +  .--  ..  -  ....  +  .-  +
> .-.  ..  -..  ..  -.-.  ..-  .-..  ---  ..-  ...  +  ...  -.--  ...  -
> .  --  +  ---  ..-.  +  ..  -.  -  .  -.  -  ..  ---  -.  .-  .-..  +
> ---  -...  ...  ..-.  ..-  -.-.  .-  -  ..  ---  -.  +
> 
> OK, all joking aside, every standard has its place, some messages are
> helped by html and others hurt. To state that html has either no place
> in email or is always the preferred encoding is merit-less
> fundamentalism.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list