bnr bnr, You lose all your geek cred for that message... :D On Jul 3, 2010, at 10:30 AM, bnr bnr wrote: > -.-- --- ..- + .- ... -.-. .. .. + .--. . --- .--. > .-.. . + .... .- -.. + - --- + .-. ..- .. -. + .- + > ... .. -- .--. .-.. . + .-.. --- -. --. + -.. .. ... - > .- -. -.-. . + -.-. --- -- -- ..- -. .. -.-. .- - .. > --- -. + -- . - .... --- -.. + .-- .. - .... + .- + > .-. .. -.. .. -.-. ..- .-.. --- ..- ... + ... -.-- ... - > . -- + --- ..-. + .. -. - . -. - .. --- -. .- .-.. + > --- -... ... ..-. ..- -.-. .- - .. --- -. + > > OK, all joking aside, every standard has its place, some messages are > helped by html and others hurt. To state that html has either no place > in email or is always the preferred encoding is merit-less > fundamentalism. > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list