They must've. We run it on RHEL and SLES with the same performance. We also work with three developers at Red Hat that work on XFS. Red Hat doesn't support it as the root filesystem on RHEL6, although I'm unsure as to why. I'd probably still use Linux out of preference, but I can't speak to how good ZFS is. I've never used it, only heard about it being pretty good. On Oct 17, 2013 9:05 PM, "B-o-B De Mars" <mr.chew.baka at gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/17/2013 8:46 PM, Andrew Dahl wrote:: > >> I do XFS development for work, so my bias says XFS :-) >> >> It's actually going to be the default filesystem on RHEL7 and has >> comparable performance to ext3/4 (except it scales) >> >> But yeah, ZFS wouldn't be a bad choice. >> >> > I was reading about performance issues with XFS in RHEL 6. Seems it > wasn't a problem with XFS itself, but a bug introduced by RH. All the > articles were close to a year old. I couldn't find anything online about > RH correcting the issue in version 6. Have you heard about this, and do > you think it might have been resolved? > > If you were to use ZFS would you still use Linux? > > Thans > ______________________________**_________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/**mailman/listinfo/tclug-list<http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20131017/08b9d4f4/attachment.html>