Heh, true. I'm just saying that "Cheap Android" is incompete at best.

On Sat, 3 May 2014, Ryan Coleman wrote:

> Well, “cheap” isn’t a bad word to describe it. :)
>
>
> On May 3, 2014, at 17:12, tclug at freakzilla.com wrote:
>
>> This isn't a "Cheap Android". This is a "Cheap, ancient and horrible Android".
>>
>> To begin with, it uses Android 2.3, which was released in 2010. That means a whole lot of stuff will just not work. It also implies the hardware is phenominally outdated. Actually, nevermind implying, the specs are right there. It's a tiny, tiny phone (3.2" screen) with an ancient CPU and barely any RAM.
>>
>> This is the kind of phone that makes people hate Android because they think this is what the experience is like. It's like if you wanted to know what Windows 8 is like, so you got an 8-year-old laptop with a 20gb harddrive and 1gig of RAM and Windows XP and then complained it's slow, has not diskspace and no modern software will run on it.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 3 May 2014, Brian Wood wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.amazon.com/PCD-Chaser-Prepaid-Android-Virgin/dp/B0087T0XA8
>>> Chaser phone for $30 or best offer.
>>> --
>>> Brian
>>> Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
>>> http://webEbenezer.net
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>