Heh, true. I'm just saying that "Cheap Android" is incompete at best. On Sat, 3 May 2014, Ryan Coleman wrote: > Well, “cheap” isn’t a bad word to describe it. :) > > > On May 3, 2014, at 17:12, tclug at freakzilla.com wrote: > >> This isn't a "Cheap Android". This is a "Cheap, ancient and horrible Android". >> >> To begin with, it uses Android 2.3, which was released in 2010. That means a whole lot of stuff will just not work. It also implies the hardware is phenominally outdated. Actually, nevermind implying, the specs are right there. It's a tiny, tiny phone (3.2" screen) with an ancient CPU and barely any RAM. >> >> This is the kind of phone that makes people hate Android because they think this is what the experience is like. It's like if you wanted to know what Windows 8 is like, so you got an 8-year-old laptop with a 20gb harddrive and 1gig of RAM and Windows XP and then complained it's slow, has not diskspace and no modern software will run on it. >> >> >> On Sat, 3 May 2014, Brian Wood wrote: >> >>> http://www.amazon.com/PCD-Chaser-Prepaid-Android-Virgin/dp/B0087T0XA8 >>> Chaser phone for $30 or best offer. >>> -- >>> Brian >>> Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. >>> http://webEbenezer.net >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >