On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:35 PM, gregrwm <tclug1 at whitleymott.net> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:27 PM, gregrwm <tclug1 at whitleymott.net> wrote: >> >> which firefox? sounds quite like my experience with bionic:firefox-esr. >> bionic:firefox (quantum) seems stable. > > > Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (64-bit) > Firefox Quantum 61.0.1 (64-bit) > Firefox Quantum 61.0.1 (64 bit (I've been running that way for maybe 10/12 years)) Firefox-esr 60.1.0 (64) both from Mozilla directly. Debian seems stuck at esr 52.9.0 so that's why I grabbed both directly. Both seem to suck but perhaps the esr version even more but not by much!