On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:35 PM, gregrwm <tclug1 at whitleymott.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:27 PM, gregrwm <tclug1 at whitleymott.net> wrote:
>>
>> which firefox?  sounds quite like my experience with bionic:firefox-esr.
>> bionic:firefox (quantum) seems stable.
>
>
> Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (64-bit)
> Firefox Quantum 61.0.1 (64-bit)
>
Firefox Quantum 61.0.1 (64 bit (I've been running that way for maybe
10/12 years))
Firefox-esr 60.1.0 (64)

both from Mozilla directly.
Debian seems stuck at esr 52.9.0 so that's why I grabbed both
directly. Both seem to
suck but perhaps the esr version even more but not by much!