<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Josh Trutwin wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20050901232528.00001261@prokofiev" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:46:59 -0500
Jeremy Rosengren <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jeremy@rosengren.org"><jeremy@rosengren.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This was probably talked about ad nauseum when the change was made,
but I missed it.
Why is the TCLUG list not configured with a reply-to that sends back
to the list? This is the only mailing list subscription I have for
which I have to do a reply all in order to get the message back to
the list.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Oh boy - here we go.
Here are two separate viewpoints:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html">http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml">http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
So it's somewhat of a purity vs. ease-of-use argument. This is the
only list of the 20 (- 5-10 that I've unsubscribed from) that I
subscribe to that does this, however. Are there other people on this
list who subscribe to a lot of other mailing lists that are configured
the way the TCLUG list is?<br>
<br>
-- jeremy<br>
<br>
p.s. I got an email from Dave Alanis saying his response was meant to
be taken humorously. Sorry I misinterpreted.<br>
</body>
</html>