-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think running wireless as the only access system, one of the things i've found in situations like that, is wireless is not a substitute for wired infrastructure. maybe HPNA might be an option.. 10mbit over existing lines.. it's cheap, fairly fast, and can be converted to ethernet easily - -ben "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends." On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Jon Kotek wrote: > > > Hey all, I have been requested to come up with a proposal for a customer of > mine. They have an office building that leases small offices with services. > They would like to offer net access but because of the age of the building > running cat5 is going to be spendy. I have recommended possibly using > wireless. Now I need to find out what would the best way to deploy this. > The building is VERY old and because of that there are walls that can be up > to 16 inches thick cement. I would like to know what would the best access > points to deploy and the best authentication to use. There is already some > Cat5 ran through the building so I can hook into them but there also might be > places where I would have to install a repeater. > > > Thanks! > > Jon > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Wireless Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.tcwug.org > tcwug-list at tcwug.org > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tcwug-list > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9Yu/oflzKmtpiQEMRAtfSAJ4mnIuaLVlVXJm9d50yA9q1M7L3wACghhAh sCtPQ3/WAYqKUgqPbCqk9lE= =HP3E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----